Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam

Question #: 97
Topic #: 1

If you are starting a new ERC20 token:

Ait would be best to start from scratch, just looking at the required interface.

Bit is beneficial to copy and paste the already existing code from the Ethereum wiki and modify this until you like it.

Cbest is to start with an audited implementation, for example from OpenZeppelin, in order to reuse already existing code.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Joseph at Sep 11, 2024, 04:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carmen

2 months ago

Jokes on you, I'm going to use a quantum computer to generate my own unique ERC20 token. No more of this copy-paste business!

upvoted 0 times

...

Samuel

2 months ago

Ah, the age-old dilemma of building vs. borrowing code. I'd say Option C is the most pragmatic choice. Ain't nobody got time for starting from scratch these days.

upvoted 0 times

Lawrence

1 months ago

Copying and pasting code can lead to errors. It's safer to use a trusted source like OpenZeppelin.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

1 months ago

I agree, starting with a solid foundation like OpenZeppelin's implementation is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patria

1 months ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. Why reinvent the wheel when you can use audited code?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashonda

2 months ago

Haha, Option A? Really? That's like building a house from scratch when you can just use a blueprint. Option C is the way to go, my dude.

upvoted 0 times

Shayne

1 months ago

It's important to prioritize security and efficiency when creating a new ERC20 token.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanesa

1 months ago

I agree, using an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin is definitely the safer option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Monte

1 months ago

Yeah, starting from scratch seems like a lot of unnecessary work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domitila

2 months ago

I see the benefits of reusing code from OpenZeppelin, it can save time and effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

2 months ago

I prefer starting with an audited implementation to ensure security and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shayne

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe copying and modifying existing code is more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elbert

3 months ago

I think it's best to start from scratch and design the interface myself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

3 months ago

I'd go with Option B. Modifying existing code is faster and you can customize it to your liking. Who needs all that auditing nonsense?

upvoted 0 times

Meghan

2 months ago

Youlanda: Exactly, no need to reinvent the wheel.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

2 months ago

True, it's better to prioritize security when creating a new token.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

2 months ago

I agree, starting with something already there saves time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

2 months ago

I think Option B is the way to go. It's quicker to modify existing code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

2 months ago

That's a good point. Maybe it's safer to go with Option C and use audited code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

2 months ago

But what if there are security vulnerabilities in the code you copy?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronald

2 months ago

I agree, Option B sounds like the quickest way to get started.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deane

3 months ago

Option C for sure! Why reinvent the wheel when you can use audited code from OpenZeppelin? Saves time and reduces the risk of vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

Valentine

3 months ago

Definitely, it's a smart choice to reduce the risk of vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eloisa

3 months ago

I agree, using audited code from OpenZeppelin is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...