Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam

Question #: 90
Topic #: 3

If you are starting a new ERC20 token:

Ait would be best to start from scratch, just looking at the required interface.

Bit is beneficial to copy and paste the already existing code from the Ethereum wiki and modify this until you like it.

Cbest is to start with an audited implementation, for example from OpenZeppelin, in order to reuse already existing code.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Lynelle at Jun 02, 2024, 02:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carrol

5 months ago

Haha, I'd rather not try starting from scratch. That's like building a house without any blueprints.

upvoted 0 times

Romana

5 months ago

Yeah, it's easier to use existing code and modify it to fit your needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

5 months ago

I agree, starting from scratch sounds like a lot of work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

6 months ago

B sounds like a recipe for disaster. Modifying existing code can introduce all sorts of vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

Aliza

5 months ago

C is a good idea. Using an audited implementation reduces the risk of introducing vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elfrieda

5 months ago

A sounds like a safer option. Starting from scratch ensures that the code is clean and secure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

6 months ago

I agree, starting with an established implementation is the smart choice. Saves a lot of time and effort.

upvoted 0 times

Layla

5 months ago

It saves a lot of time and effort in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

5 months ago

Agreed, it's a smart choice to reuse existing code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aliza

5 months ago

Starting with an audited implementation is definitely the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

6 months ago

I agree with Thersa. Starting with audited code reduces the risk of vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emeline

6 months ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

Naomi

5 months ago

I agree, starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin's can save a lot of time and effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lino

6 months ago

It's important to prioritize security when creating a new ERC20 token.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

6 months ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

6 months ago

I agree, starting with an audited implementation is a smart choice for a new ERC20 token.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

6 months ago

I agree, starting with an audited implementation is a smart choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ardella

6 months ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashon

6 months ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

6 months ago

I think option C is the best choice. It's safer to use audited code.

upvoted 0 times

...