Broadcom Exam 250-428 Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Broadcom's 250-428 exam

Question #: 93
Topic #: 2

An organization needs to add a collection of DNS host names to permit in the firewall policy.

How Should the SEP Administrator add these DNS host names as a single rule in the firewall policy?

ACreate a Most Group and add the DNS host names. Then create a firewall rule with the new Host Group as the Source/ Destination

BCreate a Host Group and add the DNS domain. Then create a firewall rule with the new Host Group as the Local/ Remote.

CCreate a Host Group and add the DNS host names. Then create a firewall rule with the new Host Group as the Local/Remote

DCreate a Host Group and add the DNS domain. Then create a firewall rule with the new Host Group as the Source/ Destination

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Tiffiny at Aug 05, 2024, 09:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 250-428 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Merlyn

3 months ago

Is there an option E where we just write the DNS names on a piece of paper and tape it to the firewall? That's my kind of IT solution right there!

upvoted 0 times

...

Raelene

3 months ago

I'm going with option C. It's the simplest and most straightforward solution. Plus, it just makes sense to use the DNS host names directly in the firewall rule.

upvoted 0 times

Penney

2 months ago

I see your point, but I still think option C is the most direct way to add the DNS host names.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

2 months ago

I think option A could work too, creating a Host Group with the DNS host names.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

3 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the best choice. It's clear and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

4 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between options C and D. I like the idea of using a Host Group, but I'm not sure if the Source/Destination or Local/Remote designation is more appropriate. Maybe I'll flip a coin!

upvoted 0 times

Renea

2 months ago

That's a good point. It really depends on the specific requirements of the organization. Both options have their merits.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

2 months ago

I see your point, but I think option D might be better. Using the Host Group as Source/Destination could provide more flexibility in the firewall rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emiko

2 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the most straightforward approach. It keeps everything organized and easy to manage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bo

2 months ago

I think option C is the way to go. Adding the DNS host names to a Host Group and using it as Local/Remote in the firewall rule makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theron

4 months ago

I'm leaning towards option D because it makes more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgilio

4 months ago

Option B is interesting, but I'm not sure if adding the DNS domain instead of the specific host names is the best approach. Wouldn't that be too broad?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rusty

4 months ago

I disagree, I believe option C is the best way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pura

4 months ago

I think option C is the correct answer. Creating a Host Group and adding the DNS host names, then using that group in the firewall rule, seems like the most straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times