Alright, let's break this down. The code is missing the implementation of the Base class destructor, and we need to ensure that the memory allocated for the ptr member is properly released. I think option D is the way to go. Simple and effective!
You know, I'm still a bit confused about the whole pointer thing. Is the ptr variable a member of the Base class? I need to review my C++ fundamentals before this exam.
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trick us with those answer choices. C is clearly wrong, since deleting the pointer twice would result in a double-free error. That's a big no-no!
I agree with Marvel, but I'm also curious about option B. Could it be that no additional code is needed if the Base class has a proper default destructor implementation? That would be the simplest solution.
Okay, let's think this through. The code is missing the destructor implementation for the Base class, which could lead to a memory leak. I'm leaning towards option D, since deleting the pointer once should do the trick.
Huey
5 months agoNorah
6 months agoJohnetta
6 months agoNorah
6 months agoClorinda
7 months agoZachary
7 months agoLashawnda
7 months agoClorinda
7 months agoLashandra
8 months agoCarlee
8 months agoAltha
8 months agoDaniel
8 months agoMyong
7 months agoHana
7 months agoLisha
7 months agoMarvel
8 months agoGaynell
8 months ago