Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Certinia Exam PSA-Sysadmin Topic 2 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Certinia's PSA-Sysadmin exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 2
[All PSA-Sysadmin Questions]

You receive a requirement to add a secondary approval for Expense Reports whenever an Expense amount exceeds the set threshold amount.

How would you configure this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bettina
4 months ago
C is the clear winner here. Though I must say, the idea of a 'Secondary Approval' makes me wonder if there's a 'Tertiary Approval' and a 'Quaternary Approval' waiting in the wings. Where does it end?!
upvoted 0 times
Brett
3 months ago
I think C is the best choice too. And who knows, maybe there will be a 'Tertiary Approval' in the future!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
3 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most straightforward option to configure the secondary approval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
3 months ago
C is definitely the way to go. It allows for a more customized approval process based on the expense amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yolando
4 months ago
That could work too, but I think creating a new Approval Process gives us more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
4 months ago
But wouldn't it be easier to just edit the Approval Process Component on the Expense Reports Lightning Page?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
4 months ago
I agree with Yolando. We can set the Entry Criteria based on the Expense Amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
4 months ago
Option B seems a bit overkill, doesn't it? Why edit the Lightning Page when you can just set up a new Approval Process? C is the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
Definitely C. Why complicate things with Lightning Pages and Custom Settings when you can just create a dedicated Approval Process? Efficient and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Dolores
3 months ago
Yeah, C is definitely the way to go for adding a secondary approval for Expense Reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
4 months ago
I think I'll go with C as well, it just makes sense to keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
4 months ago
Agreed, creating a new Approval Process seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
4 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catherin
5 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Creating a new Approval Process with Entry Criteria based on the Expense Amount is the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Chaya
4 months ago
I think I will go with option C as well. It seems like the most efficient way to handle this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
5 months ago
I agree, creating a new Approval Process with Entry Criteria makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yolando
5 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. We need to create a new Approval Process for Expense Reports.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77