CheckPoint Exam 156-586 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-586 exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 1

After kernel debug with "fw ctl debug" you received a huge amount of information. It was saved in a very large file that is difficult to open and analyze with standard text editors. Suggest a solution to solve this issue.

ADivide debug information into smaller files. Use 'fw ctl kdebug -f -o 'filename' -m 25 - s '1024'

BUse 'fw ctl zdebug' because of 1024KB buffer size

CUse Check Point InfoView utility to analyze debug output

DReduce debug buffer to 1024KB and run debug for several times

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Vincenza at Apr 11, 2024, 02:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 156-586 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Yoko

6 months ago

Reducing the debug buffer to 1024KB and running debug several times seems like a practical solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

6 months ago

Check Point InfoView utility could also be helpful in analyzing the debug output.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

6 months ago

I think using 'fw ctl zdebug' with 1024KB buffer size might be more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

6 months ago

Have you tried dividing the debug information into smaller files using 'fw ctl kdebug'?

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

7 months ago

I am struggling with the huge amount of debug information after kernel debug.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

7 months ago

That's a valid point, It could be a good approach to tackle the issue in a different way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tish

7 months ago

I prefer option D, reducing the debug buffer to 1024KB and running debug multiple times seems like a more efficient solution to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

7 months ago

I agree with splitting the information into smaller files will definitely help in managing such a large amount of data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

7 months ago

I think option A is a good idea, dividing the debug information into smaller files will make it easier to analyze.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

8 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writers are just trying to trip us up with this one. They're probably sitting back and laughing at all the confused candidates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanjuana

8 months ago

Option D seems a bit risky to me. Reducing the debug buffer size might cause us to miss some important information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not familiar with the Check Point InfoView utility. Does anyone have experience using that?

upvoted 0 times

Nickolas

7 months ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Horace

7 months ago

User 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxanne

7 months ago

User 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Valene

7 months ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Burma

8 months ago

Option B with the 'fw ctl zdebug' command could work too, but I'm not sure if that would give us the same level of detail as the 'fw ctl debug' output.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

8 months ago

Yeah, I agree. I think option A is probably the best solution here. Dividing the debug info into smaller files makes a lot of sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rima

8 months ago

Wow, this question is tricky! I've definitely had to deal with those huge debug files before. It's such a pain to open them with normal text editors.

upvoted 0 times

...