Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRO19-P01-1 Topic 9 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P01-1 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 9
[All CIMAPRO19-P01-1 Questions]

A major company sells a range of electrical, clothing and homeware products through a chain of department stores. The main administration functions are provided from the company's head office. Each department store has its own warehouse which receives goods that are delivered from a central distribution center.

The company currently measures profitability by product group for each store using an absorption costing system. All overhead costs are charged to product groups based on sales revenue. Overhead costs account for approximately one-third of total costs and the directors are concerned about the arbitrary nature of the current method used to charge these costs to product groups.

A consultant has been appointed to analyses the activities that are undertaken in the department stores and to establish an activity based costing system.

The consultant has identified the following data for the latest period for each of the product groups for the X Town store:

Calculate the total profit for each of the product groups:

.... using the current absorption costing system;

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ora
4 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to deal with all these complex accounting methods. Give me a simple cash register and a stack of receipts any day!
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
4 months ago
Yeah, dealing with receipts is much easier than all these complex methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
4 months ago
I prefer the simplicity of just using a cash register too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
4 months ago
I agree, accounting can be so confusing sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
4 months ago
Hmm, D looks tempting, but I bet the consultant will find a way to make the numbers look even more 'interesting' once they're done with their analysis.
upvoted 0 times
Zona
3 months ago
You might be right, the consultant could surprise us with the final numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards B, it seems like a balanced option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
4 months ago
I agree, A seems like the most conservative choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 months ago
I think D is too risky, I would go with A just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlie
5 months ago
The current absorption costing system seems to be flawed, as the overhead costs are allocated arbitrarily. I hope the consultant's activity-based costing analysis can provide a more accurate picture of profitability.
upvoted 0 times
Johnson
3 months ago
I'm curious to see how the total profit for each product group will change with the new costing system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
3 months ago
I think the activity-based costing system will give us a better understanding of where the profits are coming from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
3 months ago
I agree, the current method of allocating overhead costs doesn't seem fair.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
3 months ago
I'm curious to see how the total profit for each product group will change with the new costing system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
3 months ago
I think the activity-based costing system will give us a better understanding of each product group's profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
4 months ago
I agree, the current method of allocating overhead costs doesn't seem fair.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alex
5 months ago
I calculated the total profit for each product group using the current system, but I'm not confident in the results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
5 months ago
I believe implementing an activity based costing system will provide a more accurate picture of profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
I agree, the arbitrary nature of charging overhead costs based on sales revenue is concerning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
I think the current absorption costing system is not accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77