Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L3M2 Topic 2 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L3M2 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 2
[All L3M2 Questions]

The budget for procurement staff costs is 100,000 but only 90,000 has been spent in the period. This has resulted in substantial further work for procurement staff members, sometimes working into the evening or at weekends.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

As less has been spent than budgeted, the variance is favourable.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Paulina
2 months ago
Ooh, this is a tough one. I'm going to have to think about the implications of the extra work before I decide. B might be the safest choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Major
1 months ago
C) Adverse?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 months ago
B) None of the above?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
2 months ago
A) Is the variance:
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nida
2 months ago
Haha, this question is trying to trick us! Spending less than the budget is always a good thing, even if the staff had to work harder. Definitely D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
2 months ago
Hold up, if they spent less than the budget, how can that be adverse? I think D is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Annette
1 months ago
D) Favourable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
1 months ago
C) Adverse?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 months ago
B) None of the above?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 months ago
A) Is the variance:
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
1 months ago
I think D is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
1 months ago
Hold up, if they spent less than the budget, how can that be adverse?
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
1 months ago
D) Favourable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 months ago
C) Adverse?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
2 months ago
B) None of the above?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
2 months ago
A) Is the variance:
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ilona
3 months ago
Should we look into why the budgeted amount was not fully utilized and address any inefficiencies?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
3 months ago
Yes, it is adverse because the actual cost is less than the budgeted cost, causing extra work for staff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
3 months ago
Is the variance adverse?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
3 months ago
Woah, this is a tricky one. If the staff had to work extra hours, that sounds like an adverse variance to me. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
3 months ago
Hmm, if the budget was 100,000 but only 90,000 was spent, then the variance must be favorable, right? I'm going with D!
upvoted 0 times
Salena
2 months ago
Hopefully they can take a well-deserved break now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
2 months ago
They must have been working really hard to stay within budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
2 months ago
That's good news for the procurement staff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
Yes, you're correct! The variance is favorable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77