Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS Exam L5M3 Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All L5M3 Questions]

Restitution damages are often calculated before contracts are signed and are clearly stated within a contract. Which of the following statements is not true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

'restitution damages cannot be mitigated by the actions of the innocent party' is the untrue state-ment out of these four. The general principle of Restitution Damages is that the innocent party is expected to be proactive in mitigating the consequences of any breach and should not allow costs to spiral out of control. See p. 124


by Gayla at May 18, 2024, 03:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L5M3 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lili
6 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers had a field day coming up with these tricky answer choices. Restitution is no laughing matter, though!
upvoted 0 times
Alysa
6 months ago
It's important to understand the implications before signing any contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
6 months ago
I know, restitution damages can be quite complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
6 months ago
Yeah, these answer choices are really making me think.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynelle
6 months ago
D is definitely not true. The innocent party can take actions to mitigate the damages, reducing the restitution owed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
7 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. Restitution is based on the gain to the breaching party, not the loss to the innocent party.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
5 months ago
That's right, it's not about the innocent party's loss but the breaching party's gain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
5 months ago
I agree, restitution damages focus on what the breaching party gained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
6 months ago
That's right, it's not about the loss to the innocent party but the gain to the breaching party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
6 months ago
I agree, restitution damages are calculated based on how much the breaching party gained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
6 months ago
That's right, it's not about the innocent party's losses at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
6 months ago
I agree, restitution damages are all about how much the breaching party gained.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marylyn
7 months ago
Option A seems wrong. Restitution damages can include future losses, just not as the primary focus.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
6 months ago
D) restitution damages cannot be mitigated by the actions of the innocent party
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
6 months ago
Option A seems wrong. Restitution damages can include future losses, just not as the primary focus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
6 months ago
C) restitution damages are calculated based on how much the breaching party gained, rather than how much the innocent party lost
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
7 months ago
B) restitution damages may leave the breaching party in a worse position than they were in before the contract began
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
7 months ago
A) restitution damages means you are unable to claim for future losses
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77