Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L5M3 Topic 2 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 2
[All L5M3 Questions]

When assessing damages caused by a breach, which of the following statements is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is: 'damages attempt to position the innocent party in the position that they would have been had the contract been performed as expected'. This is a quote from p. 121 Option1 is incorrect as unliquidated damages aren't stated in a contract. Option 2 is incorrect because liquidated damages are an assessment of damages before a breach. Option 4 is incorrect because not all breaches are caused by errors (they can be caused by negligence or the offending party withholding something).


Contribute your Thoughts:

Catalina
24 days ago
Ah, the age-old question of contract damages. I'm going with C - it's the only one that makes sense from a legal perspective. Though I do wonder if the offending party gets a discount for their 'creative interpretation' of the contract.
upvoted 0 times
Linsey
5 days ago
I think damages should definitely aim to put the innocent party back in the position they would have been in if the contract was fulfilled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
11 days ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most fair and logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
1 months ago
D sounds good, but I'm pretty sure that's not the right answer. Damages are about compensating the innocent party, not punishing the offending one.
upvoted 0 times
Adolph
7 days ago
I think C is the correct answer. It's about making things right for the innocent party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
7 days ago
B) damages can be difficult to assess before a breach has occurred and therefore should be decided through conflict resolution
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
8 days ago
C) damages attempt to position the innocent party in the position that they would have been in had the contract been performed as expected
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
22 days ago
A) damages are limited to what is stated within the contract
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noe
1 months ago
I agree with Luis, damages are meant to put the innocent party in the position they would have been in if the contract was performed as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 months ago
Haha, the correct answer is definitely not B. Waiting for a breach to happen before deciding on damages? That's like trying to close the barn door after the horses have already escaped!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The purpose of damages is to put the innocent party back in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed as expected.
upvoted 0 times
Kent
5 days ago
It's important for damages to make up for the harm caused by the breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
6 days ago
I think damages should definitely aim to restore the innocent party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
9 days ago
That makes sense, damages are meant to compensate for the breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
20 days ago
I agree, option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
1 months ago
Yes, damages are meant to make the innocent party whole again after a breach of contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
1 months ago
That makes sense. It's important for the innocent party to be compensated for any losses they incurred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 months ago
I agree, option C is correct. Damages aim to position the innocent party as if the contract was performed as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77