Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 200-201 Topic 6 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 200-201 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 6
[All 200-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A suspicious IP address is tagged by Threat Intelligence as a brute-force attempt source After the attacker produces many of failed login entries, it successfully compromises the account. Which stakeholder is responsible for the incident response detection step?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Delmy
5 months ago
Employee 4 could have a role too, but based on the exhibit, I still think employee 3 is more likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
But what about employee 4? Couldn't they also be responsible for detecting the brute-force attempt?
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
5 months ago
I agree with Delmy, employee 3 seems like the one who should have detected the suspicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
5 months ago
I think employee 3 is responsible for the incident response detection step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
6 months ago
Ooh, security team, huh? I bet they're just sitting back and eating donuts while the rest of us sweat over these questions. Lucky them!
upvoted 0 times
Vilma
5 months ago
Ooh, security team, huh? I bet they're just sitting back and eating donuts while the rest of us sweat over these questions. Lucky them!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
Correct! Employee 3 is responsible for the incident response detection step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
5 months ago
B) employee 3
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Velda
6 months ago
Hmm, let me take a look at the exhibit again. Okay, so we have a suspicious IP address and a successful compromise of an account. I'm thinking it's gotta be the security team, so maybe employee 4?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
6 months ago
Yeah, I agree. This whole scenario with the brute-force attack and compromised account is giving me a headache. I'm going to have to really think this one through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
6 months ago
Amen to that! I just hope I can keep my wits about me and pick the right answer. Fingers crossed!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77