Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-215 Topic 1 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-215 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 1
[All 300-215 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A company that uses only the Unix platform implemented an intrusion detection system. After the initial configuration, the number of alerts is overwhelming, and an engineer needs to analyze and classify the alerts. The highest number of alerts were generated from the signature shown in the exhibit. Which classification should the engineer assign to this event?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Thurman at Jun 03, 2024, 11:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-215 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Cory
3 months ago
This question really takes me back to my days of trying to keep my computer safe from the 'Y2K bug'.
upvoted 0 times
Silva
1 months ago
D: Definitely, it's important to properly classify the alerts to avoid unnecessary actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
2 months ago
C: False Positive alert makes sense, especially if the alerts are overwhelming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
2 months ago
B: I agree, the signature in the exhibit seems to be triggering false alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
2 months ago
A: I think the engineer should assign a False Positive alert to this event.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carolann
3 months ago
D) True Positive alert, no doubt. Those threats are as real as my grandma's meatballs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
I'd go with C) False Positive alert. All those alerts are probably just the system freaking out over harmless activity.
upvoted 0 times
Melvin
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, the system is probably just overreacting to normal activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
3 months ago
User1: I agree, C) False Positive alert seems like the most likely classification.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
4 months ago
Hmm, this signature looks like it's causing a lot of false alarms. The engineer should probably tune the detection system to reduce the noise.
upvoted 0 times
Bea
3 months ago
Bea: The engineer should tune the system to reduce the noise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
3 months ago
Tori: We should also consider updating the signature database for better accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
3 months ago
Rory: Maybe adjusting the sensitivity of the detection system could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
3 months ago
Hillary: It seems like there are many false alarms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
3 months ago
Engineer: I agree, we need to fine-tune the system to reduce false alarms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
4 months ago
Engineer: This signature is generating a lot of alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
4 months ago
I agree with Jesusita. The signature in the exhibit seems to be triggering alerts incorrectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
4 months ago
I think the engineer should assign False Positive alert to this event.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77