Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-215 Topic 3 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-215 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 3
[All 300-215 Questions]

A network host is infected with malware by an attacker who uses the host to make calls for files and shuttle traffic to bots. This attack went undetected and resulted in a significant loss. The organization wants to ensure this does not happen in the future and needs a security solution that will generate alerts when command and control communication from an infected device is detected. Which network security solution should be recommended?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bo
4 months ago
Cisco Secure Firewall ASA is a solid choice, but Firepower is probably the more targeted solution for this specific threat. It's like trying to use a butter knife to perform open-heart surgery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
4 months ago
Haha, the Cisco Secure Web Appliance (WSA) is probably not the best choice here. Unless the attacker is using the web browser to access the command and control server, it won't be much help in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Pete
3 months ago
C: Yeah, Cisco Secure Email Gateway (ESA) could also help in detecting suspicious communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
3 months ago
B: I agree, Cisco Secure Firewall ASA is also a good choice for network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
4 months ago
A: I think the best option would be Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (Firepower). It can detect and block malicious traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catrice
4 months ago
I believe option B) is the most suitable solution as it specifically focuses on threat defense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
4 months ago
I think option A) Cisco Secure Firewall ASA could also be a good choice for network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
4 months ago
I'm not so sure. Cisco Secure Email Gateway (ESA) could also be a good option to monitor and block any suspicious email attachments or links that could be used for the initial malware infection.
upvoted 0 times
Lasandra
3 months ago
D) Cisco Secure Web Appliance (WSA)
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
4 months ago
C) Cisco Secure Email Gateway (ESA)
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
4 months ago
B) Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (Firepower)
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
4 months ago
A) Cisco Secure Firewall ASA
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lilli
5 months ago
Definitely Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (Firepower). It's designed to detect and alert on command and control communication, which is exactly what the organization needs to prevent this attack from happening again.
upvoted 0 times
Twanna
3 months ago
Definitely the right choice to prevent future attacks like this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
3 months ago
Agreed, it's the best option to detect and alert on command and control communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
3 months ago
I think we should go with Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (Firepower).
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
3 months ago
Definitely the right choice to prevent future attacks like this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
4 months ago
Agreed, it's the best option to detect and alert on command and control communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
4 months ago
I think we should go with Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (Firepower).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gene
5 months ago
I agree with Eden, option B) can detect command and control communication from infected devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
5 months ago
I think option B) Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (Firepower) would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77