Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-410 Topic 10 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 10
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer configured IP SLA to monitor a next hop on a router for reachability When the next hop is unreachable, the router is executing tracking and failing over another route, but packet loss is experienced because the reachability is flapping. Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosendo
4 months ago
Alright, let's get serious here. I'm going with option C. Delay up and down should do the trick and keep those packets flowing smoothly. Now, can we move on to the next question? I'm starting to feel like I'm back in networking 101.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
4 months ago
Whoa, hold up! Is this an IP SLA exam or a joke contest? Seriously, though, I'd go with option B. Increasing the timeout seems like the most straightforward way to smooth out the flapping.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
3 months ago
Yeah, increasing the timeout of the sla probe should help stabilize the reachability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
3 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice to fix the flapping issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice to prevent the flapping issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
3 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. Increasing the timeout could help stabilize the reachability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
4 months ago
I think option B is the safer bet, it directly addresses the issue of flapping reachability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
4 months ago
But wouldn't increasing the frequency of the sla probe to 60 also help in this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
4 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cortney
4 months ago
Why not just crank up the frequency of the SLA probe to 60? That'll give the router a better chance of catching the issue before it becomes a problem. Seems like the easiest solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Kip
4 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that should help catch the issue before it causes packet loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
4 months ago
User 1: I think increasing the frequency of the SLA probe to 60 is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noah
5 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. Appending the delay up and down parameters to the track command should help stabilize the flapping behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
5 months ago
I think the issue can be resolved by increasing the timeout of the SLA probe to 6000. That should give the router enough time to detect the issue and failover without experiencing packet loss.
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
3 months ago
E: Agreed, a longer timeout can improve network stability
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
3 months ago
D: It's important to give the router enough time to failover smoothly
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
3 months ago
C: Yes, increasing the timeout should help prevent packet loss
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
4 months ago
B: That makes sense, it will give the router more time to detect the issue
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
4 months ago
B) Increase the timeout of the sla probe to 6000
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
4 months ago
A) Append delay up 0 down 0 to the track command
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
4 months ago
A: Increase the timeout of the sla probe to 6000
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77