Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-410 Topic 2 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 2
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit A network administrator is troubleshooting to reduce the routing table of R4 and R5 to learn only the default route to communicate from Inter-Area and Intra-Area networks Which configuration resolves the issue?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carlton
6 months ago
It's interesting to see different opinions on which configuration is the best. Everyone has their own rationale behind their choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
6 months ago
I personally think Option A is the best choice. It seems to have the most optimized configuration to achieve the desired result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
6 months ago
That's true, Option B could also be a valid choice. It seems to only have default route information as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
7 months ago
But what about Option B? It also looks like it could work to reduce the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
7 months ago
I agree with you. Option C seems to only have the default route information for Inter-Area and Intra-Area networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
7 months ago
I think the correct configuration to reduce the routing table of R4 and R5 is Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Option D. Configuring OSPF area 0 and setting the summary-address seems a bit more complicated than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
8 months ago
Great choice. Option C should help reduce the routing table effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
8 months ago
Let's go with Option C then. It seems to be the most suitable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
8 months ago
I agree, configuring OSPF area 0 for Option D seems a bit complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
8 months ago
Yeah, Option C looks like a good choice to learn only the default route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
8 months ago
I think Option B might work better for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
8 months ago
Option A seems like a simpler solution to reduce the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chanel
8 months ago
Option C also seems like a good choice, with the OSPF area 0 and default-information originate commands. But I'm not 100% sure it would work as well as Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B, as it looks like it would configure a default route on R4 and R5, which should help reduce the size of their routing tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
8 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher! The network topology seems pretty complex, and it's not easy to tell which configuration would be the best to reduce the routing table on R4 and R5.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77