Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-415 Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-415 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 5
[All 300-415 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Customer XYZ cannot provison dual connectivity on both Its routers due to budget constratnts but wants to use tnth RI and R2 interface for users behind them for load toward the hub site Which configurauon achieves this objectives?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kenneth
3 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I thought we were supposed to be learning how to configure routers, not play Tetris with the interfaces!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
3 months ago
I bet the guy who wrote this question loves to see us squirm. Option C is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Hildred
3 months ago
I agree, Option C seems to be the most suitable configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irma
4 months ago
Gotta love a question that really makes you think about network design. Option D seems like the most reliable choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
3 months ago
I think Option A could also work, but Option D is definitely more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
I agree, Option D looks like the best solution for the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
3 months ago
I see your point, but I still believe Option D is the most reliable option for this network setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
3 months ago
I think Option C could also work well in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
3 months ago
I agree, Option D looks like the best choice for ensuring load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
3 months ago
Option D seems like the most reliable choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenore
4 months ago
I agree with Giuseppe. Option A seems to be the best choice considering the budget constraints mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
4 months ago
I think the answer is Option A because it shows the configuration that achieves the objective of using both R1 and R2 interfaces for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
4 months ago
C'mon, who would pick Option A? That's just asking for trouble with a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
Leonida
3 months ago
User 3: Option B also looks like a good choice to distribute the load effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
3 months ago
User 2: Definitely, I would go with Option C for better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
4 months ago
User 1: I agree, Option A seems risky with a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
4 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. Separating the interfaces for load balancing is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, separating the interfaces will definitely help with distributing the load efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, separating the interfaces for load balancing is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
4 months ago
User 1: I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
4 months ago
https://www.practice4test.com/question_updater/json_images/300-415/OtherImage_74266e52b-3cb8-4bd7-a058-3c5b7cf66cdd.png
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
4 months ago
https://www.practice4test.com/question_updater/json_images/300-415/OtherImage_74266e52b-3cb8-4bd7-a058-3c5b7cf66cdd.png
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77