Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-415 Topic 5 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-415 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 5
[All 300-415 Questions]

An application team is getting ready to deploy a new business-critical application to the network. To protect the traffic, the network team must add another queue to the QoS map and then deploy the map to fabric Which configuration slop must be completed prior to adding the queue to the QoS map and applying If

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Adding a new QoS queue to handle business-critical application traffic involves several specific steps in Cisco SD-WAN's vManage:

1.Configure QoS Class and Hardware Queue Relationship:

oNavigate to the 'lists' page within the Local Policy section of vManage.

oDefine the relationship between the new QoS class and the appropriate hardware queue. This step is crucial as it ensures that the new traffic class is mapped correctly to the underlying hardware resources, which are responsible for enforcing the QoS policies.

1.Applying the QoS Map:

oOnce the new QoS class and hardware queue relationship is configured, the updated QoS map must be applied to the relevant interfaces.

oSpecifically, the QoS map should be applied to the WAN interface. This ensures that the new QoS policies are enforced on the traffic as it traverses the WAN, which is typically where QoS management is most critical due to bandwidth constraints and variable network conditions.

1.Reference:

oCisco SD-WAN Quality of Service Configuration Guide

oCisco SD-WAN vManage Policy Configuration Documentation


Contribute your Thoughts:

Julie
6 days ago
I'm really feeling option A on this one. The 'lists' page of the Local Policy section is where you set up the QoS class-to-hardware queue mapping, and then you apply it to the WAN interface. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
7 days ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. This is a tricky one, but I'm going with B. The key is that it's the 'Local Policy' section, not the 'Centralized Policy' section.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
9 days ago
I'm pretty sure it's D. The 'lists' page of the Centralized Policy section is where you configure the relationship, and then you apply the QoS map to the service-side interface.
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
2 days ago
I think you're right, D seems to be the correct option for configuring the relationship between the new QoS class and the hardware queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassi
12 days ago
That's an interesting point, but I still think it should be done from the Centralized Policy section. Let's review the options again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
17 days ago
I disagree, I believe the relationship should be configured from the 'lists' page of the Local Policy section of vManage before applying the QoS map to the WAN interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
23 days ago
I think the correct configuration step is to configure the relationship between the new QoS class and the hardware queue from the 'lists' page of the Centralized Policy section of vManage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
23 days ago
Hmm, I think C is the correct answer. The relationship between the new QoS class and the hardware queue must be configured from the 'lists' page of the Centralized Policy section of vManage, and then the QoS map is applied to the WAN interface.
upvoted 0 times
Luis
6 days ago
Yes, that's correct. Once that's done, the QoS map can be applied to the WAN interface for the new business-critical application deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
15 days ago
I agree, C seems to be the right choice. It's important to configure the relationship between the QoS class and hardware queue from the Centralized Policy section of vManage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77