Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 4 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 4
[All 300-420 Questions]

An engineer is designing a campus network with Cisco Catalyst 95CO switches in the aggression layer. The design requires running nonblocking Layer 2 MEC from the aggregation layer to the access layer. The Catalyst switches are located on different campus floors for availability reasons, and each access switch veil contam a single VLAN. Which technology must the engineer choose for the aggregation switches in the design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Margurite
6 months ago
Haha, yeah, StackWise Virtual is definitely not the right choice here. That's like bringing a knife to a gun fight. We need something that can handle the campus-wide network requirements, not just a local solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
6 months ago
You know, I was initially thinking StackWise Virtual might be the answer, but after reading the question again, I don't think that's the case. StackWise Virtual is more for stacking switches within the same chassis, not for connecting different campus floors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
6 months ago
I agree, VPC does seem like the better option here. It can provide the required nonblocking Layer 2 MEC functionality and also allows the aggregation switches to be located on different floors for availability. VSS, on the other hand, requires the switches to be co-located.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawnda
5 months ago
I agree, StackWise-180 may not be the best option for this design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
5 months ago
D) StackWise-180
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
5 months ago
StackWise Virtual may not provide the nonblocking Layer 2 MEC functionality needed here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
5 months ago
C) StackWise Virtual
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
5 months ago
I am not sure if VSS would work in this case. VPC seems like the better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
5 months ago
B) VSS
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
5 months ago
I think VPC is the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
5 months ago
A) VPC
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alex
6 months ago
Hmm, this question is pretty tricky. We need to choose the right technology for the aggregation switches to support a nonblocking Layer 2 MEC. VPC and VSS are both good options, but I'm leaning more towards VPC since it seems to be the more flexible and scalable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77