Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 4 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 4
[All 300-420 Questions]

An engineer is designing a campus network with Cisco Catalyst 95CO switches in the aggression layer. The design requires running nonblocking Layer 2 MEC from the aggregation layer to the access layer. The Catalyst switches are located on different campus floors for availability reasons, and each access switch veil contam a single VLAN. Which technology must the engineer choose for the aggregation switches in the design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Edna
5 months ago
StackWise Virtual, huh? Sounds like the engineers are trying to create a virtual superhero team for the network. I'm all for it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
5 months ago
I agree with Daron, StackWise Virtual seems like a solid choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
5 months ago
I think StackWise Virtual could also be a good option, it offers flexibility and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking of going with VSS, but StackWise Virtual makes more sense for this scenario. It's like having a double-decker bus for your network - more space and stability.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
3 months ago
StackWise-180 might be a good choice for smaller networks, but for a campus network with multiple floors, StackWise Virtual is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
3 months ago
VSS is a good option too, but StackWise Virtual offers more flexibility and ease of management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
3 months ago
I agree, StackWise Virtual would be the best choice for this design. It provides redundancy and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
4 months ago
StackWise-180 could work, but StackWise Virtual is definitely the way to go for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
4 months ago
VSS is a good option too, but StackWise Virtual offers more flexibility and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
4 months ago
I agree, StackWise Virtual would be the best choice for this design.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe VSS would be a better choice for this design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
I think the engineer should choose VPC for the aggregation switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
5 months ago
I agree with Troy. StackWise Virtual is the way to go for this design. It's like having two brains working together, but with a single body. Efficient and reliable!
upvoted 0 times
Tamekia
4 months ago
D) StackWise-180
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
C) StackWise Virtual
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
4 months ago
B) VSS
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
4 months ago
A) VPC
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Troy
5 months ago
The correct answer is C) StackWise Virtual. This technology allows the aggregation switches to operate as a single logical device, providing non-blocking Layer 2 MEC to the access layer.
upvoted 0 times
Portia
4 months ago
B: Yes, that technology allows the switches to operate as a single logical device for non-blocking Layer 2 MEC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
5 months ago
A: I think the engineer should choose C) StackWise Virtual for the aggregation switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77