Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 5 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 5
[All 300-420 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer Is designing a multicampus Layer 3 Infrastructure using EIGRP as the routing protocol. The design must provide quick replies to queries In the event of a downlink, prevent unnecessary queries, and ensure that traffic does not unnecessarily transit the access layer. Which two actions must the engineer take for the network design? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alesia
7 months ago
Yes, that would help in ensuring traffic does not unnecessarily transit the access layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
7 months ago
But shouldn't they also configure distribution layer switches to summarize routes to the core layer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
7 months ago
I agree, that would prevent unnecessary queries and ensure quick replies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
7 months ago
I think the engineer should configure access layer switches as stub routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
8 months ago
Okay, so we're looking at B and either C or D as the right answers then. I'm leaning more towards D - configuring both the core and access as stub routers, that way we get the quick replies and no unnecessary transit no matter where the query originates.
upvoted 0 times
Emily
8 months ago
Yes, with those configurations in place, the network should be able to meet the requirements effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
8 months ago
I think summarizing routes to the distribution layer may also help in achieving the desired network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
8 months ago
Configuring both the access and core layer switches as stub routers could provide the most optimal solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
8 months ago
I agree, configuring the access layer switches as stub routers seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
8 months ago
Configuring the distribution layer switches to summarize routes to the core layer could be beneficial as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
8 months ago
I think configuring the core layer switches as stub routers will also help achieve the design goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ria
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that. Stub routing could definitely help prevent those unnecessary queries, and summarization at the distribution layer would keep the traffic from unnecessarily going through the access switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
8 months ago
I agree, this is a tough one. I'm thinking the answer might involve configuring the distribution layer to summarize routes to the core, and either the core or access layer as stub routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
8 months ago
Hmm, this question is tricky. I think the key is to understand the requirements - quick replies, preventing unnecessary queries, and no unnecessary transit through the access layer. That's a lot to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77