Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 8 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 8
[All 300-420 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A customer has two eBGP peerings from a single CE router toward two service providers. The customer has hired an architect to design a solution to ensure certain traffic enters the customer's network through interface gg0/0. Which solution must the architect include in the design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Arthur
2 months ago
Local preference, eh? Sounds like the architect has to be a real *preference* whisperer to get this one right. Haha, get it? Preference? Ah, never mind, I'll see myself out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
Ah, the old BGP routing dance. I'd say D is the way to go here. Setting the local pref high is the best way to ensure that traffic takes the desired path. Plus, it's less likely to cause any unintended consequences down the line.
upvoted 0 times
Raina
1 months ago
I think setting a higher local preference is the most reliable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
1 months ago
But what about prepending additional AS on the AS path?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 months ago
I agree, setting the local preference is a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelba
2 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Breaking the routes into longer prefixes seems a bit hacky, and prepending ASes could get messy. I think D is the cleanest solution, but I'd double-check the configuration just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Jade
1 months ago
User 3: I would also double-check the configuration just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
1 months ago
Yeah, setting a higher local preference makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
2 months ago
I agree, D seems like the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
2 months ago
But wouldn't it also be effective to prepend additional AS on the AS path toward the preferred service provider?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
2 months ago
Hmm, the answer seems pretty straightforward. I'd go with D, setting a higher local preference to the preferred service provider path. That's the most direct way to influence the BGP decision process.
upvoted 0 times
Lashanda
1 months ago
Definitely, setting the local preference can help achieve that goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
1 months ago
Agreed, it's a simple and effective solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
1 months ago
I think it's important to prioritize one service provider over the other in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
2 months ago
Setting a higher local preference makes sense. It's a good way to control the traffic flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
3 months ago
I agree, setting a higher local preference would ensure the traffic enters through the desired interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
3 months ago
I think the architect should set a higher local preference to the preferred service provider path.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77