Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 8 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 8
[All 300-420 Questions]

An engineer is designing a WAN solution for a customer with teams in different branch locations that need to communicate The teams also need to access enterprise applications hosted in the data center and the cloud The customer also must provide guests with connectivity to the internet only, and the internet gateway is located in the data center Which solution must the engineer choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sunshine
2 months ago
I bet the engineer who wrote this question is sitting back, laughing at all the poor souls trying to figure it out. 'Separate VRFs? Haha, good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
Lasandra
24 days ago
D) MPLS Layer 3 VPN with a separate VRF for each branch location
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 months ago
B) firewall placed in data center that filters any traffic from guests
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
1 months ago
C) MPLS Layer 3 VPN with one VRF for corporate access and a separate VRF for guests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Holley
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of corporate and guest networks. I say we just put up a big 'No Guests Allowed' sign and call it a day. But seriously, I agree with C. Gotta keep those pesky guests away from the good stuff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
Option D sounds like overkill. Do we really need a separate VRF for each branch? I think C is the way to go - keep it simple, but still keep the traffic separated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
2 months ago
I don't know, man. Putting the firewall in the data center seems like a lot of extra work. Why not just use a different service provider for the guests? That's the simple solution.
upvoted 0 times
Melinda
1 months ago
C) MPLS Layer 3 VPN with one VRF for corporate access and a separate VRF for guests
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
1 months ago
I agree, using a different service provider for guests seems like the simplest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
2 months ago
B) firewall placed in data center that filters any traffic from guests
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
A) WAN connectivity from a different service provider for guests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ilene
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D could also work well for providing connectivity to branch locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
3 months ago
Option C looks good to me. Separating corporate and guest traffic is a must, and MPLS VPNs are a solid choice for WAN connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
Gerardo
2 months ago
That could work too, but MPLS Layer 3 VPNs provide a more scalable and flexible solution for connecting branch locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be more cost-effective to have a firewall in the data center to filter guest traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
2 months ago
I agree, having separate VRFs for corporate and guest traffic will ensure better security and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
2 months ago
Option C looks good to me. Separating corporate and guest traffic is a must, and MPLS VPNs are a solid choice for WAN connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myrtie
3 months ago
I agree with Elvis, using MPLS Layer 3 VPN with separate VRFs is the best solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
3 months ago
I think the engineer should choose option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77