Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 1 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 1
[All 300-425 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An enterprise has offices spread around the globe. The APs are connected to different controllers installed in separate datacenters. The IT team wants to allow clients to roam from controllers in group ABC to controllers in group XYZ. Which feature must be incorporated in the design to accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tamera
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but isn't workgroup bridge also a possibility for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's switch peer group that allows for roaming between controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
4 months ago
I think the feature needed for clients to roam between controllers is mobility lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
4 months ago
I think C) mDNS gateway might be the correct answer, as it helps with device discovery across subnets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) workgroup bridge could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is D) mobility lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) switch peer group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
6 months ago
Haha, good one! It's like having a roaming SIM card for your wireless clients. Just make sure they don't rack up any international roaming charges!
upvoted 0 times
Elbert
5 months ago
Interesting, let's weigh the pros and cons of each option before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
5 months ago
B) workgroup bridge could also be a potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
5 months ago
I agree, let's see if anyone else has a different perspective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
5 months ago
Well, both options could work, but let's see what others think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
5 months ago
Really? I was leaning towards C) mDNS gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
Hmm, I think it might be better to go with D) mobility lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
A) switch peer group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfreda
6 months ago
Aha, I think 'mobility lists' is the right answer here. This feature allows the controllers to share client information and session state, enabling clients to seamlessly roam between controller groups. Smart!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
6 months ago
Yeah, mobility lists makes perfect sense. It's like having a universal translator for your clients as they move around the globe - no more getting lost in translation!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77