Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 2 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam

Question #: 100
Topic #: 2

Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer has identified that during a recent controller failure, several APs failed over to the tertiary controller instead of the secondary controller. The configuration from one of the APs is provided. Which design consideration led to the issue?

AThe secondary controller was at capacity.

BThe secondary controller is an SSO configuration.

CThe tertiary controller is an HA-SKU controller, so it took priority.

DThe tertiary controller is in the same subnet as the primary controller.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Cassi at Sep 13, 2024, 08:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-425 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carmen

2 months ago

Ah, the good old 'secondary controller at capacity' problem. The networking version of 'turning it off and back on again'!

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

2 months ago

I bet the network engineer is regretting that 'set it and forget it' approach right about now. Shoulda kept a closer eye on those controllers!

upvoted 0 times

Ashlee

22 days ago

Exactly. The network engineer should have ensured proper failover configurations to prevent this issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edda

1 months ago

So the tertiary controller took priority because it's an HA-SKU controller, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Isabelle

1 months ago

Definitely! Looks like the secondary controller was at capacity, causing the APs to fail over to the tertiary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

2 months ago

APs failing over to the tertiary controller instead of the secondary? That's a major design flaw.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

2 months ago

The tertiary controller being in the same subnet as the primary? That's just asking for trouble. Gotta keep those separate, people!

upvoted 0 times

Salena

1 months ago

The secondary controller being at capacity could also have caused the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elizabeth

2 months ago

I agree, that's a design flaw waiting to happen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

2 months ago

Yeah, having the tertiary controller in the same subnet as the primary is a big no-no.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolene

2 months ago

I'm not convinced the tertiary controller being an HA-SKU is the issue. Wouldn't that actually provide more redundancy and stability?

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

3 months ago

Hmm, the secondary controller being at capacity seems like the most likely culprit here. Overloading can definitely cause failover issues.

upvoted 0 times

Timmy

1 months ago

Could be a network configuration issue then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

1 months ago

D) The tertiary controller is in the same subnet as the primary controller.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

1 months ago

That makes sense, having a higher priority controller.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josphine

2 months ago

User 3: Maybe they should consider upgrading the capacity of the secondary controller.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caren

2 months ago

C) The tertiary controller is an HA-SKU controller, so it took priority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabra

2 months ago

Maybe the failover settings need to be adjusted.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

2 months ago

B) The secondary controller is an SSO configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

2 months ago

User 2: That could definitely cause the APs to failover to the tertiary controller.

upvoted 0 times

...

Osvaldo

2 months ago

I think the secondary controller was at capacity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruth

2 months ago

Yeah, that could definitely cause some problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

2 months ago

A) The secondary controller was at capacity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verlene

3 months ago

I think the issue was due to the tertiary controller being in the same subnet as the primary controller.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawna

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe it was because the tertiary controller is an HA-SKU controller.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrie

3 months ago

I think the issue was caused by the secondary controller being at capacity.

upvoted 0 times

...