Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 2 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam

Question #: 99
Topic #: 2

A customer has a single anchor WLC named Anchor

AAnchor A is in a DMZ and provides guest access. The customer wants to deploy an additional anchor controller named Anchor B to provide redundancy if Anchor A fails. Which design approach should be taken for the guest WLAN priority on the foreign WLC for each anchor WLC?

ASet Anchor A to priority 3 and Anchor B to priority 3.

BSet Anchor A to priority 3 and Anchor B to priority 1.

CSet Anchor A to priority 1 and Anchor B to priority 1.

DSet Anchor A to priority 1 and Anchor B to priority 3.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Marget at Sep 19, 2024, 12:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-425 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Veronica

2 months ago

I see your point, Hannah. Having both anchors at priority 1 would ensure seamless failover in case of Anchor A failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hannah

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe setting both Anchor A and Anchor B to priority 1 would be a better approach for redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

3 months ago

C'mon, setting both to priority 1? That's just asking for a traffic jam on the guest network. I'm with Ellsworth on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Alethea

2 months ago

It's always good to have a backup plan in place for network redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latrice

2 months ago

That way, if Anchor A fails, Anchor B can take over with higher priority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bea

2 months ago

Maybe setting Anchor A to priority 3 and Anchor B to priority 1 would be a better option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raul

2 months ago

I agree, setting both to priority 1 could cause congestion.

upvoted 0 times

...

3 months ago

I think we should set Anchor A to priority 3 and Anchor B to priority 1.

upvoted 0 times

...