New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 4
[All 300-425 Questions]

Based on a wireless network design, an engineer configured a primary and secondary controller for their APs. A power interruption caused the primary Cisco WLC to go down, and, as expected, all APs joined the secondary controller. When the primary controller came back up, all the

APs remained joined to the secondary controller. Which approach must the engineer take for the APs to move back to the primary?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Levi
3 months ago
But wouldn't setting AP Fail over Priority to 4 on each AP also work? It seems like a valid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
3 months ago
Haha, this question is a piece of cake! The answer is clearly C. Fallback to the primary controller is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd go with D and set the AP Fail over Priority to Critical globally.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
2 months ago
Let's go with that then. It seems like the most reliable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I believe setting AP Fail over Priority to Critical globally is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
2 months ago
But wouldn't setting AP Fallback to Enabled on the primary controller also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
2 months ago
Yeah, that sounds like the best approach to ensure the APs switch back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
2 months ago
That makes sense, it should force the APs to move back to the primary controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
2 months ago
I think setting the AP Fail over Priority to Critical globally is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
I think setting the AP Fail over Priority to Critical globally is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
3 months ago
I agree with Rosio. That way the APs will move back to the primary controller once it's back up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
3 months ago
I think the engineer should set AP Fallback to Enabled on the primary controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
3 months ago
I think the answer is C. Setting AP Fallback to Enabled on the primary controller should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Yuette
2 months ago
Maybe enabling AP Fallback on the secondary controller could also help in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
2 months ago
I think globally setting AP Fail over Priority to Critical might be the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
But wouldn't setting AP Fail over Priority to 4 on each AP be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
3 months ago
I agree, setting AP Fallback to Enabled on the primary controller should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
3 months ago
I think setting AP Fail over Priority to 4 on each AP might also help in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
3 months ago
I agree, setting AP Fallback to Enabled on the primary controller should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77