Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 5 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 5
[All 300-425 Questions]

An engineer is configuring a centralized set of controllers for separate facilities. Which two Cisco wireless architectures must be used to ensure flexible sizing of WLAN to VLAN mappings? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vernell
3 months ago
Controller group could also be useful for configuring multiple controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
3 months ago
I believe mobility group is also important for centralized set of controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
4 months ago
I agree, AP group allows for flexible WLAN to VLAN mappings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
4 months ago
I think the answer is AP group and mobility group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
4 months ago
Yes, interface group helps in managing multiple VLANs efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
4 months ago
I believe interface group should also be used for this configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
5 months ago
I agree, AP group allows for easy WLAN to VLAN mappings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
5 months ago
I think the engineer should use AP group for flexible sizing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
6 months ago
Yep, those are my picks as well. The other options don't really seem to fit the bill - I mean, an interface group? What is this, the 90s?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
6 months ago
Ooh, good call! Mobility group allows you to manage a group of controllers as a single entity, which could definitely help with flexible WLAN to VLAN mapping. And AP group lets you organize your access points into logical groups, which would also be useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
6 months ago
I agree, this is definitely an important topic. Let's see, the options are interface group, mobility group, AP group, controller group, and RF group. Personally, I think mobility group and AP group are the two that would be most relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
Deandrea
5 months ago
Definitely, those are the key architectures to use in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
I think we are on the right track with selecting mobility group and AP group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
5 months ago
Absolutely, those choices will provide the flexibility needed for separate facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
5 months ago
So, we should use mobility group and AP group for this centralized set of controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
5 months ago
Yes, those two options would definitely ensure flexible sizing of WLAN to VLAN mappings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
5 months ago
I agree, mobility group and AP group are important for this configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rozella
6 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our knowledge of Cisco wireless architectures. The key seems to be ensuring flexible sizing of WLAN to VLAN mappings, so we'll need to choose the right options for that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77