Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 6 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 6
[All 300-425 Questions]

A company is in the process of relocating to a new force space and ends out that the Internet circuit will not be ready before the move. The new building has a non-Cisco WLAN to which they can connect. The engineer has a 12-port switch and one Cisco autonomous AP and must connect multiple wired devices. Which additional device is needed to get all clients connected over the workgroup bridge?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dianne
2 months ago
I think a transparent firewall could also be a good option to consider for connecting all clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
3 months ago
A wireless controller? For a single AP? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Gotta be the wireless bridge.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
1 months ago
Agreed, a wireless bridge should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, a wireless controller seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 months ago
User 1: Why not just use a wireless bridge for that single AP?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 months ago
The hub would work too, but the wireless bridge is the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
1 months ago
Agreed, a wireless controller would be overkill for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
2 months ago
Definitely the wireless bridge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
2 months ago
D) wireless controller
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
2 months ago
C) hub
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
2 months ago
B) transparent firewall
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
2 months ago
A) router
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
2 months ago
D) wireless controller
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
2 months ago
A) router
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michal
3 months ago
I'm not sure about the wireless controller, I think a hub might also work in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
3 months ago
Haha, a hub? Are we still in the 90s? Definitely need a wireless bridge to tie everything together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
3 months ago
A router? Really? That's way too much for this setup. I'd go with a wireless bridge to keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
3 months ago
Hmm, I think we need a wireless bridge to connect the wired devices to the non-Cisco WLAN. Option B seems a bit overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Eric
2 months ago
I think a router might be too complex for this setup, a wireless controller would be simpler to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
2 months ago
A hub could also work to connect the wired devices, but a wireless controller would be more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
I agree, a wireless controller would help manage the connections efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
3 months ago
Option D) wireless controller would be the best choice to connect all clients over the workgroup bridge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilburn
3 months ago
I agree with Felice, a wireless controller would be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
3 months ago
I think we need a wireless controller to get all clients connected.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77