Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 7 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam

Question #: 98
Topic #: 7

An engineer needs a wireless design to provide redundancy for APs at remote sites that are connected to Cisco 3504 Wireless LAN

Controllers. The central Cisco 5520 Wireless LAN Controller supports 2000 APs and has 1975 access points associated to it. The engineer decides that not all APs at the remote sites must remain functional in the event of a failure. How does the engineer ensure that the most important access points at the remote sites remain online while not impacting the main site?

AEnable Global AP Fail over Priority, set the 1975 APs to a priority of 'high', and set the 25 most important APs at the remote sites to 'critical'.

BEnable AP Fallback Mode, set the 1975 APs to a priority of 'high', and set the 25 most important APs at the remote sites to 'critical'. C. Enable Global AP Fail over Priority, leave the 1975 APs at the default priority, and set the most important APs at the remote sites to 'low'.

DEnable AP Fallback Mode, leave the 1975 APs at the default priority, and set the most important APs at the remote sites to 'high'.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Melda at Sep 15, 2024, 11:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-425 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aaron

2 hours ago

I agree, setting the 25 most important APs to 'critical' ensures they remain online in case of a failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronald

3 days ago

I'm going with option B. Combining the AP Fallback Mode with the priority settings seems like the best way to maintain redundancy while prioritizing the critical APs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

10 days ago

I think option A is the best choice because it prioritizes the most important APs at the remote sites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alisha

16 days ago

Option D looks good to me. Leaving the main site APs at the default priority and setting the remote site APs to high should ensure the most important ones stay up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

21 days ago

I think option A is the way to go. Prioritizing the most important APs at the remote sites and leaving the main site APs at a high priority should do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

Victor

2 hours ago

Yeah, setting the 25 most important APs at the remote sites to 'critical' will definitely help maintain connectivity in case of a failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

6 days ago

Having a failover priority system in place is crucial for maintaining network reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mollie

7 days ago

It's important to have a plan in place to prioritize certain APs in case of a failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Skye

8 days ago

Setting the 25 most important APs at the remote sites to 'critical' will definitely help in maintaining connectivity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Enola

8 days ago

I agree, option A seems like the best choice to ensure the most important APs stay online.

upvoted 0 times

...

Howard

10 days ago

I agree, option A seems like the best choice to ensure the most important APs stay online.

upvoted 0 times

...