Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 8 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 8
[All 300-425 Questions]

A customer has this wireless design:

* two Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series wireless controllers that are configured in a high-availability SSO cluster to manage the APs in a local office network

* 100 APs in local mode that are registered to the high-availability cluster

* one Catalyst 9800 Series wireless controller that is deployed as an anchor in a DMZ

* a CAPWAP tunnel in UP state between the high-availability cluster and the anchor WLC

The customer wants the anchored traffic to remain up if a single WLC in the high-availability cluster fails. How must this requirement be incorporated into the design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Samuel
2 months ago
D sounds like a good option, but I wonder if it's really necessary. The high-availability cluster should handle the failover seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
2 months ago
Haha, B is like bringing in the big guns - EMC APs as anchors? Overkill much?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
C seems like a lot of work. Why create separate tunnels when you can just use the high-availability cluster as the primary base?
upvoted 0 times
Janine
28 days ago
User 4: That sounds like a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 months ago
User 3: A) Configure the APs with the high-availability cluster as the primary base.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 months ago
Why create separate tunnels when you can just use the high-availability cluster as the primary base?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
C seems like a lot of work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Polly
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe we should also consider option D) Configure the mobility MAC address for the high-availability cluster to ensure seamless failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
3 months ago
Option A makes the most sense. If the high-availability cluster is the primary base, the anchored traffic will remain up even if a single WLC fails.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
1 months ago
Definitely, having a reliable design is crucial for network stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
1 months ago
It's important to have a solid backup plan in case of a WLC failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
2 months ago
That's true, having the high-availability cluster as the primary base ensures traffic remains up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
2 months ago
Option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
3 months ago
I agree with Raul. If we configure the APs with the high-availability cluster as the primary base, the anchored traffic should remain up even if a single WLC fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Configure the APs with the high-availability cluster as the primary base.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77