Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-435 Topic 3 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-435 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 3
[All 300-435 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. Interfaces named Loopback0, Loopback1, and Loopback2 must be created and enabled on a Cisco IOS XE target device in the lab group. Which loop must be added to the end of the Ansible ''create int'' task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Germaine
4 months ago
That's a good point, Kaitlyn. I may have to rethink my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
But doesn't with_items make more sense since we are creating multiple interfaces?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) with_parent: '{{intlist}}'. It makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) with_list: '{{intlist}}'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) with_items: '{{intlist}}'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
6 months ago
Hold up, guys. What if we need to do something more complex, like creating the interfaces with specific parameters? Maybe with_list or with_parent would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
6 months ago
Hmm, good point. But I think for this specific question, with_items is the way to go. The question doesn't mention any additional requirements beyond creating and enabling the interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
6 months ago
You're right. And looking at the options, I think with_items is the way to go. It allows us to iterate over a list of items, which is exactly what we need here.
upvoted 0 times
Howard
5 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
5 months ago
I agree with you, using with_items would make more sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
5 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
5 months ago
I think with_list should be used instead. It seems more appropriate in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
5 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
5 months ago
Yes, with_items is the correct option for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
5 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
6 months ago
Agreed. with_items seems like the best choice. It's simple and straightforward, and it should get the job done. Plus, it's a classic Ansible loop, so it's a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77