Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-440 Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-440 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All 300-440 Questions]

A company with multiple branch offices wants a suitable connectivity model to meet these network architecture requirements:

* high availability

* quality of service (QoS)

* multihoming

* specific routing needs

Which connectivity model meets these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology using dynamic routing and prioritized traffic for QoS meets the network architecture requirements of the company. A fully meshed topology provides high availability by eliminating single points of failure and allowing multiple paths between branch offices. SD-WAN technology enables multihoming by supporting multiple transport options, such as MPLS, internet, LTE, etc. SD-WAN also provides QoS by applying policies to prioritize traffic based on application, user, or network conditions. Dynamic routing allows the SD-WAN solution to adapt to changing network conditions and optimize the path selection for each traffic type. A fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology can also support specific routing needs, such as segment routing, policy-based routing, or application-aware routing.Reference:

Designing and Implementing Cloud Connectivity (ENCC) v1.0

[Cisco SD-WAN Design Guide]

[Cisco SD-WAN Configuration Guide]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tawanna
3 months ago
Star topology with internet-based VPN connections and BGP for routing? Really? I think that's a little outdated, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
2 months ago
D: That could work well for high availability and specific routing needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
2 months ago
C: What about a fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology using dynamic routing and prioritized traffic for QoS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
2 months ago
B: Maybe a hybrid topology that combines MPLS and SD-WAN would be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
3 months ago
A: I agree, star topology with internet-based VPN connections and BGP seems a bit outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Golda
3 months ago
I prefer option A, hub-and-spoke topology with MPLS for specific routing needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
3 months ago
Fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology? Sign me up! Dynamic routing and prioritized traffic for QoS - that's the future right there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
3 months ago
Multihoming, you say? I'm more of a unihoming kind of guy myself, but to each their own.
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
2 months ago
B: I agree, option D seems to offer the most flexibility and control over the network architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
3 months ago
A: I think option D, fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology, would be the best choice for high availability and specific routing needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
3 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option C combining MPLS and SD-WAN could also meet the requirements effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
4 months ago
I agree with Rosita, option D with SD-WAN technology seems like the most suitable for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
4 months ago
Wait, did someone say MPLS? I thought that was a new kind of sandwich. My bad, carry on.
upvoted 0 times
Dorathy
3 months ago
User 3: I agree, that option seems to cover all the necessary aspects like high availability and specific routing needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
3 months ago
User 2: I think option C, the hybrid topology with MPLS and SD-WAN, would be a good fit for the company's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
3 months ago
User 1: MPLS is not a sandwich, it's a type of network connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosita
4 months ago
I think option D sounds like the best choice for high availability and QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77