Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 12 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 12
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Company X is multihomed to a service provider. With the default settings, the link between PE2 and CE1 is the primary link, but company X has asked for the link between PE4 and CE2 to operate as the primary instead. A network engineer used a route map with local-preference to manipulate the routes from PE2 to CE1 to be less desirable and applied the route map on PE2 outbound to CE1. However, the path from PE2 to CE1 is still preferred. Which action must the engineer take so that the desired path is chosen?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kanisha
3 months ago
I think applying MED in the outbound direction on PE2 to CE1 with a cost lower than the path from PE4 to CE2 could be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
4 months ago
D seems like the way to go. Applying a lower MED value on the outbound direction should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Benton
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option D is probably the most effective solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Option D seems more straightforward and targeted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
2 months ago
But what about option A? Applying local-preference on PE2 outbound to CE2 with a value less than 100 could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
3 months ago
I think D is the best option. Lowering the MED value on the outbound direction should help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenda
4 months ago
But wouldn't configuring the AS path prepend attribute to increase the number of hops between CE2 and PE4 also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe configuring the weight attribute on PE2 in the outbound direction to CE2 with a value less than 65535 is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
4 months ago
Ha! This is like a game of routing tug-of-war. Gotta love these CCNA questions that make you think outside the box.
upvoted 0 times
Jenelle
3 months ago
I think the engineer should apply local-preference on PE2 outbound to CE2 with a value less than 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
4 months ago
Yeah, these questions really test your troubleshooting skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenda
4 months ago
I think the engineer should apply local-preference on PE2 outbound to CE2 with a value less than 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
4 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Wouldn't configuring the weight attribute on PE2 be a more direct way to influence the routing decision?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
4 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. Manipulating the AS path prepend should make the path from PE4 to CE2 more preferable.
upvoted 0 times
Alica
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A could also be a valid choice. Applying local-preference on PE2 outbound to CE2 with a value less than 100 might work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
3 months ago
User3 might be onto something. Manipulating the AS path prepend could make the path from PE4 to CE2 more preferable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
3 months ago
I see your point, but I still think B is the correct answer. Manipulating the AS path prepend seems like the best option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also work by manipulating the AS path prepend.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
3 months ago
I disagree, I think the answer is D. Using MED in the outbound direction on PE2 to CE1 should make that path more preferred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
I agree with User1. That seems like the right action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
3 months ago
I think the answer is A. Applying local-preference on PE2 outbound to CE2 should make the desired path chosen.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77