Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 13 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 13
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

IS-IS is the routing protocol on the network. After the team noticed excessive CPU usage on all routers, particularly routers R2 and R6, they configured route summarization on all routers. However, a network engineer noticed that summary routes and more specific routes are present in the routing table on R1. Which action must the team take so that R1 receives only the summary routes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Karan
4 months ago
I believe configuring R6 only for all routers would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Configuring R3 and R5 to handle the summarization for both levels seems like the most comprehensive solution. Plus, it's always good to have a backup plan, just in case.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
4 months ago
Good point. It's always important to consider redundancy in network configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
4 months ago
That's true, but having redundancy with multiple routers handling the summarization can provide a backup in case one router fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have a single router handle the summarization for all routers? Option D seems like a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
I think option C is a good choice too. Having multiple routers handle the summarization can help distribute the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
5 months ago
Ah, the joys of routing protocols and excessive CPU usage. I bet the team wishes they could just unplug everything and call it a day. But alas, the show must go on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
5 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to configure the Level 1 and Level 2 routers separately? I think option B might be the safest bet here.
upvoted 0 times
An
3 months ago
Agreed. Option B seems like the safest bet to ensure R1 receives only the summary routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
3 months ago
That makes sense. We can also configure R6 to perform summarization for Level 2 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
4 months ago
I think we should configure R3 to perform summarization for Level 1 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
4 months ago
That could work too, but I think option B provides a more organized approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
4 months ago
But wouldn't it be simpler to just configure R6 to perform summarization for all routers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
4 months ago
I agree, separating Level 1 and Level 2 routers for summarization sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Configuring R6 to perform summarization for all routers should do the trick and keep R1's routing table nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
4 months ago
Agreed, configuring R6 for summarization should help clean up R1's routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
4 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nguyet
5 months ago
But what about configuring R3 for Level 1 routers and R6 for Level 2 routers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
5 months ago
I think we should configure R2 and R4 for Level 1 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77