Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 2 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam

Question #: 83
Topic #: 2

The ISP_A network is configured with PIMv2 with sparse mode. The engineering team at ISP_A must implement multicast support following RFC 5059 in the network. The RP priority will be 0, and the solution must require limited supervision from the operations team. Which action must the team take to meet the requirements?

AImplement Auto-RP on the candidate RP and the mapping agent only.

BImplement Static RP across all routers in the network.

CImplement bootstrap router in the network core.

DImplement Anycast-RP on edge routers only.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Nichelle at Apr 12, 2024, 06:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Delisa

6 months ago

What about implementing bootstrap router in the network core? That could also meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

6 months ago

I believe implementing Auto-RP on the candidate RP and the mapping agent only would require limited supervision from the operations team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kindra

6 months ago

But wouldn't it be more efficient to implement Static RP across all routers in the network?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregg

7 months ago

I think we should implement Anycast-RP on edge routers only.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniela

7 months ago

But won't using Anycast-RP on edge routers only require more supervision from the operations team?

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

7 months ago

I'm leaning towards option D and implementing Anycast-RP on edge routers only. It seems like a simpler solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

7 months ago

I disagree, I believe we should choose option B and implement Static RP across all routers in the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniela

7 months ago

I think we should go with option A and implement Auto-RP on the candidate RP and the mapping agent only.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

8 months ago

You know, I was actually thinking about option A - implementing Auto-RP on the candidate RP and the mapping agent. That way, we can have a dynamic RP selection process, and the ops team only needs to configure the candidate RP and mapping agent. Seems like the best balance of features and simplicity to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beth

8 months ago

Haha, yeah, that would be a real headache for the ops team. Maybe they could just set up a bootstrap router in the core instead? That way, the RP can be dynamically selected, and the priority can still be set to 0.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billi

8 months ago

Hmm, I don't know. The bootstrap router option sounds good, but it might be overkill for our requirements. What about option D? Implementing Anycast-RP on the edge routers could give us the dynamic RP selection we need, with less complexity than the bootstrap router.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

8 months ago

I don't know, I'm a little worried about the static RP approach. What if we need to change the RP in the future? Wouldn't that be a pain to update on all the routers?

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

8 months ago

I'm not so sure about that, man. Static RP might be the simplest option, but it requires a lot of manual configuration across the entire network. What if we go with option C and implement a bootstrap router in the core? That way, we can have a dynamic RP selection process and reduce the burden on the ops team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladis

8 months ago

Whoa, this question is tricky! We have to implement multicast support following RFC 5059, with an RP priority of 0 and minimal supervision for the ops team. I'm leaning towards option B - implementing Static RP across all routers. That way, we can have a centralized RP and avoid the complexity of other solutions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

8 months ago

Good point, Martina. Maybe option B, static RP, would be better since we can explicitly set the priority to 0 on the candidate RP. That way, the operations team doesn't have to worry about it too much.

upvoted 0 times

Jordan

8 months ago

Bootstrap router in the network core might not be the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annalee

8 months ago

Implementing Anycast-RP on edge routers only could be a bit complex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

8 months ago

Auto-RP on candidate RP and mapping agent might require more supervision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marget

8 months ago

That way the operations team won't need to supervise it much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yasuko

8 months ago

We can set the priority to 0 on the candidate RP with static RP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

8 months ago

Option B, static RP, sounds like a good choice to meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

8 months ago

But wait, don't we need to make sure the RP priority is set to 0? I'm not sure if Auto-RP would let us do that automatically.

upvoted 0 times

Mitzie

6 months ago

I don't think Auto-RP will allow us to set the RP priority to 0. Implementing Static RP might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

6 months ago

But wouldn't implementing Auto-RP on the candidate RP and the mapping agent only be a more efficient solution?

upvoted 0 times

...

Aliza

7 months ago

In that case, we should consider implementing Static RP across all routers in the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeniffer

7 months ago

Yes, we do need to make sure the RP priority is set to 0.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

8 months ago

I agree, Samira. And with the PIMv2 sparse mode, I think option A might be the way to go. Auto-RP seems like the easiest way to handle the RP selection without too much manual configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

8 months ago

Ooh, this is a tricky one! I'm not too familiar with all the multicast protocols, but I'm guessing the team needs to implement some kind of automatic RP discovery to meet the 'limited supervision' requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...