Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 2
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer commissioned Router 1, which connects lo Router 2 and Router 5 Router 1 participates in IS-IS routing with other routers, but it is not used for transit traffic. Traffic from Router 2 to Router 5 is expected to travel via Router 1 but the traffic is travelog via Router 3 and Router 4 Which action reserves this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kayleigh
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe removing the overload bit on Router 1 could also be a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
2 months ago
I agree with Mi, adding hello padding on Router 1 could help fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
2 months ago
Hold up, did they just say 'travelog' instead of 'traveling'? I think we need to address the real issue here - the exam question needs a proofreader!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Isn't the overload bit used to indicate that a router should not be used for transit traffic? Removing it on Router 1 might not be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
Willetta
2 months ago
Adding hello padding on Router 1 might be the solution to the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
Maybe removing the hello padding on Router 5 could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 months ago
I think adding the overload bit on Router 5 could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mi
3 months ago
I think the issue might be with the hello padding on Router 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
3 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Adding the overload bit on Router 5 seems like a more logical solution to me. It would prevent Router 1 from being used for transit traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Stephen
2 months ago
Adding hello padding on Router 1 might also be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
2 months ago
Removing the overload bit on Router 1 could also help solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
2 months ago
I agree, that would prevent Router 1 from being used for transit traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
2 months ago
I think adding the overload bit on Router 5 is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. Removing the overload bit on Router 1 should resolve the issue and allow traffic to flow as expected.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
2 months ago
I agree, removing the overload bit on Router 1 should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77