Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 6 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 6
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

IS-IS is the routing protocol on the network. After the team noticed excessive CPU usage on all routers, particularly routers R2 and R6, they configured route summarization on all routers. However, a network engineer noticed that summary routes and more specific routes are present in the routing table on R1. Which action must the team take so that R1 receives only the summary routes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dean
5 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't configuring just R6 to perform summarization for all routers simplify things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
5 months ago
I agree with Reena. Configuring R3 and R5 seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
6 months ago
I think configuring R3 and R5 to perform summarization for Level 1 and Level 2 routers is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
6 months ago
I disagree. I believe we should configure R3 to perform summarization for Level 1 routers, and R6 for Level 2 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
6 months ago
I think we need to configure R2 and R4 to perform summarization for Level 1 routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
6 months ago
I agree with Georgeanna, option A seems like the best choice because it specifies which routers should perform summarization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
7 months ago
But I feel like option D could also be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
7 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. It seems like we need to configure summarization on both the Level 1 and Level 2 routers to get the desired result on R1's routing table. That way, we can ensure the more specific routes don't make it up to the higher-level routers.
upvoted 0 times
Cherelle
7 months ago
Agreed. Option B it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
8 months ago
Exactly. It's important to have a clear and organized setup in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
8 months ago
I see your point. Option B does offer more granularity in configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
8 months ago
That's true, but it might be better to have separate configurations for Level 1 and Level 2 routers for better control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
8 months ago
But wouldn't configuring R6 to perform summarization for all routers, as in Option D, achieve the same result?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
8 months ago
Yes, I agree. Configuring summarization on both Level 1 and Level 2 routers seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
8 months ago
I think we should go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
8 months ago
Hmm, let me think through the options here. Option A seems to target the Level 1 routers specifically, which might work. Option B talks about Level 1 and Level 2 routers, which could be the key. Option C is interesting, but it's a bit broad. And Option D just has R6 doing all the summarization, which might not be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm a bit confused too. It seems like the issue might be with where we're configuring the summarization. The question is asking what action the team should take, so we need to figure out the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
8 months ago
Wow, this question on IS-IS routing summarization is really tricky. I'm not sure I fully understand why we're seeing both summary routes and more specific routes on R1's routing table even after we configured summarization on all routers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77