Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 7 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 7
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Mid-sized company Z connected two branch offices via a multicast-enabled ISP using the BGP routing protocol. PIM was implemented to support multicast streaming between the branches via MSDP Client A cannot connect to the multicast stream source of company Z. The network engineer ran a debug on the edge of the network as shown. Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ludivina
4 months ago
Ah, the joys of networking. I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above' and that the exam doesn't ask me to build a working Rube Goldberg machine as a bonus question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
4 months ago
Hold up, did you guys even read the question? The exhibit shows the debug output, so the answer is obviously A. Implement MBGP and enable a multicast address family on R2. Duh!
upvoted 0 times
Charlene
3 months ago
I see what you mean now. A makes the most sense based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The debug output clearly shows the issue. A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyra
4 months ago
D all the way, baby! Enabling BGP and advertising the subnet on R1 is the only way to go. Clearly, the problem is routing, not multicast.
upvoted 0 times
Tambra
3 months ago
Yeah, D is the way to go. Routing needs to be sorted out first before looking at multicast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most logical solution here. It's definitely a routing problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
4 months ago
I think option D is the best choice. Enabling BGP and advertising the subnet on R1 should fix the routing issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
4 months ago
D) Enable the BGP routing protocol and advertise the 10 10.10.0/24 subnet on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
4 months ago
C) Deploy BSR on routers R1 and R2 and enable multicast on both LAN segments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
4 months ago
B) Configure the PIM protocol on the Serial 1/1 interface and enable Auto-RP
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
4 months ago
A) Implement MBGP and enable a multicast address family on R2
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisandra
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Configure the PIM protocol on the Serial 1/1 interface and enable Auto-RP could also be a possible solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
5 months ago
Nah, I'm going with C. Deploying BSR on R1 and R2 and enabling multicast on both LAN segments should do the trick. Gotta love those redundant protocols!
upvoted 0 times
Teddy
3 months ago
I'm with User2 on this one. Redundant protocols can definitely help in situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best solution. Deploying BSR on R1 and R2 and enabling multicast on both LAN segments seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
3 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. Implementing MBGP and enabling a multicast address family on R2 should fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
4 months ago
Gerardo: Hmm, you may be onto something there. Redundant protocols can definitely help in situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice. Deploying BSR on R1 and R2 and enabling multicast on both LAN segments seems like the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. Implementing MBGP and enabling a multicast address family on R2 sounds like the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawna
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. Configuring PIM on the Serial 1/1 interface and enabling Auto-RP seems like the logical step to resolve the multicast connectivity issue.
upvoted 0 times
Joaquin
4 months ago
I agree, that option seems to be the most appropriate solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. Configuring PIM on the Serial 1/1 interface and enabling Auto-RP seems like the logical step to resolve the multicast connectivity issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delpha
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Deploy BSR on routers R1 and R2 and enable multicast on both LAN segments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Implement MBGP and enable a multicast address family on R2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77