New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 9 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 9
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. The service provider operations team was alerted that hub site traffic from BGP AS 65101 to AS 65201 uses a non-primary path via the R5-R6 link. IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up. and no fiber failure has been reported on the R2-R3 link The team determined that the traffic flow between 10.10.10.1 and 192.168.30.1 is not considering the R1-R2-R3-R4 path. Which action resolves this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Crista
2 months ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna have to go with option B and change the local-preference on R1. That should do the trick!
upvoted 0 times
Dierdre
1 months ago
I agree, let's go with option B and make that change on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 months ago
Yeah, that seems like the most logical solution to the issue with the traffic flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice too. Changing the local-preference on R1 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
3 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I can see your point. Let's discuss further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
3 months ago
I agree with Brigette. Adjusting the local-preference on R1 seems like the most logical solution here. Why mess with the metric when we can just prioritize the preferred path?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure changing the metric attribute on R1 is the right approach. Shouldn't we focus on the local-preference to influence the BGP path selection?
upvoted 0 times
Adrianna
1 months ago
Carmen: That could also be a valid option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
1 months ago
User 3: What about setting the local-preference to the default value on R2 for receiving routes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
2 months ago
Yeah, that could help influence the BGP path selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
2 months ago
I think changing the local-preference on R1 might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tabetha
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
3 months ago
The issue seems to be with the R1-R2-R3-R4 path not being considered. I think changing the local-preference attribute on R1 would be the best solution to resolve this.
upvoted 0 times
Mertie
2 months ago
Let's try that solution and see if it resolves the issue with the path not being considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
2 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. It could help direct the traffic flow correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
3 months ago
Option B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Change the metric attribute to 20 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77