Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-535 Topic 9 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-535 exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 9

[All 300-535 Questions]

An engineer wants to replace the BLOCK_BAD ACL on the Cisco IOS XE router with this new content. The engineer wants to use RESTCONF for this and constructs a PUT request to the resource/restconf/data/native/ip/access-list/Cisco-IOS-XE-acl:extended=BLOCK_BAD. What must the body look like to achieve the Cisco IOS XE configuration?

Desired configutation:

ip access-list extended BLOCK_BAD

permit ip any host 192.168.20.1

deny ip any any

A)

B)

C)

D)

AOption A

BOption B

COption C

DOption D

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Marjory at Nov 17, 2024, 02:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-535 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lucy

5 days ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option D just to be different, you know? Keeps the exam folks on their toes!

upvoted 0 times

...

Buddy

14 days ago

I'm not sure, but I think Option C makes sense based on the configuration provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

17 days ago

I'm not sure about this one. The options all look similar, but I think Option B might be the best fit based on the desired configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricki

18 days ago

Option C looks like the right configuration to me. The structure and syntax match what the engineer wants to achieve.

upvoted 0 times

My

4 days ago

Option C is the most suitable one here. It mirrors the required configuration for the ACL replacement using RESTCONF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

6 days ago

I think Option C is the best fit for this scenario. It closely resembles the desired configuration for the Cisco IOS XE router.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylou

9 days ago

Yes, Option C has the correct structure for the PUT request. It aligns with the engineer's goal of replacing the BLOCK_BAD ACL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

11 days ago

I agree, Option C seems to be the correct choice. The body of the PUT request should match the desired configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Tayna

23 days ago

I agree with Ceola, Option C seems to match the desired configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

24 days ago

I think the body must look like Option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77