Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 4
[All 300-610 Questions]

A Cisco engineer is configuring MPLS VPN BGP at a customer site that is connected to the provider site by more than one path MPLS VPN BGP Local Convergence link protection is enabled. After the engineer installs the main forwarding path and the redundant backup path within the BGP, they assign a unique route distinguisher to each VRF table on all PE devices that serve as a backup to the link. What is a prerequisite for this local convergence to work?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Broderick
3 months ago
I believe the answer is B) BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths. With multiple paths in MPLS VPN BGP, this support is essential for seamless failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
3 months ago
I'm not sure, Maybe having PE-CE link protection on both ends could be another requirement for local convergence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
3 months ago
But what about PE-CE link protection? Do we need that as a prerequisite for local convergence to work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
4 months ago
I agree with you, Without support for lossless switchover in BGP, local convergence won't be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
4 months ago
I think the prerequisite for local convergence to work is BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
4 months ago
I think it could also be option D, because PE-CE link protection is crucial for redundancy
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
4 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense. Lossless switchover is important for backup paths
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's actually option B because BGP needs to support lossless switchover
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
5 months ago
I think the prerequisite for local convergence to work is option A
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
6 months ago
You know, I'm just wondering why they're asking about this specific scenario. Is this a trick question or something?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
6 months ago
Ah, I see what you mean. And option D, the PE-CE link protection on both ends, doesn't seem to be a prerequisite here, since the question is focused on the local convergence within the provider's network.
upvoted 0 times
Reena
5 months ago
A: Right, that's why it's important for MPLS VPN BGP configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
5 months ago
C: So, the key is ensuring the BGP protocol can handle the switch seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
5 months ago
B: Exactly, the ability to switch paths without loss is crucial for local convergence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
5 months ago
A: Yes, that's correct. The focus is on the BGP support for switchover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
5 months ago
C: IP/GRE is enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
5 months ago
B: Interautonomous system option A (back-to-back VRF) is active.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
5 months ago
A: BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
6 months ago
Haha, yeah, that would be a pretty strange prerequisite. Alright, I think we've got a good handle on this. I'm going to go with option B as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
6 months ago
Ah, good point. The question does specifically mention that local convergence is enabled, so that must be a prerequisite.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
6 months ago
I'm not convinced that's the only requirement. Doesn't the system also need to be performing PE-CE link protection on both ends? That's what option D says.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
6 months ago
Haha, can you imagine if the answer was just 'the engineer remembers to bring their lucky rabbit's foot to work'? That would be a real wild card!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
6 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. We need BGP to be able to switch over to the backup path without dropping any traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
6 months ago
Hmm, I think the key here is that the backup path needs to be able to take over seamlessly if the main path fails. That sounds like option B to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this question. The prerequisites for MPLS VPN BGP local convergence seem a bit tricky to me.
upvoted 0 times
Darci
4 months ago
I don't think that's the right answer. Lossless switchover support in BGP is key for local convergence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
4 months ago
A) Interautonomous system option A (back-to-back VRF) is active.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
4 months ago
I think that's correct. The ability for BGP to switch between paths without losing data is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
5 months ago
B) BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77