Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 7 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam

Question #: 95
Topic #: 7

The data center aggregation layer that uses IPv4 and IPv6 address space must act as a redundant Layer 3 gateway The solution must support a minimum of 240 virtual groups for an interface The data center aggregation layer hosts network devices from different vendors Which FHRP solution meets these requirements?

AHSRPv1

BVRRPV3

CVRRPv1

DHSRPv2

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Gaynell at Aug 23, 2024, 09:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Devorah

3 months ago

VRRPV3 is the clear winner. Although, I have to say, the question itself is about as exciting as watching paint dry. Where's the fun in that?

upvoted 0 times

Andrew

1 months ago

I think we can all conclude that VRRPV3 is the right FHRP solution for this data center aggregation layer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lazaro

2 months ago

Definitely, VRRPV3 is the most suitable option for the requirements mentioned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

2 months ago

I agree, VRRPV3 is the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 months ago

VRRPV3 is the clear winner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghann

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) VRRPv1 could also be a valid option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

3 months ago

VRRPV3 is definitely the answer. I'm just curious why they didn't include an option for EIGRP or OSPF. Those would have been too easy, I guess.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

3 months ago

I agree, VRRPV3 is the way to go. It's the only option that meets all the requirements, including the multi-vendor environment.

upvoted 0 times

Glennis

3 months ago

I agree, it's the most suitable option for supporting multiple vendors and providing the required virtual groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherrie

3 months ago

VRRPV3 is definitely the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

3 months ago

Looks like we need a solution that supports IPv4 and IPv6, redundant Layer 3 gateway, and a minimum of 240 virtual groups. VRRPV3 seems to be the best fit here.

upvoted 0 times