Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All 300-610 Questions]

A Cisco engineer is configuring MPLS VPN BGP at a customer site that is connected to the provider site by more than one path MPLS VPN BGP Local Convergence link protection is enabled. After the engineer installs the main forwarding path and the redundant backup path within the BGP, they assign a unique route distinguisher to each VRF table on all PE devices that serve as a backup to the link. What is a prerequisite for this local convergence to work?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hyman
6 months ago
Option B makes the most sense to me. You can't have local convergence without the underlying BGP protocol being able to handle the switchover without any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
6 months ago
Haha, I wonder if the Cisco engineer was so focused on setting up the redundant paths that they forgot to check the BGP capabilities. Rookie mistake!
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
5 months ago
Rookie mistake if they missed that detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
5 months ago
Yeah, that's a crucial prerequisite for local convergence to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
6 months ago
I hope they remembered to check if BGP supports lossless switchover.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Magnolia
6 months ago
I agree with you, Selma. Having lossless switchover is crucial for ensuring seamless failover in case of link failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
6 months ago
I think the prerequisite for local convergence to work is BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
6 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. MPLS VPN BGP local convergence is all about maintaining active and backup paths, and BGP needs to support that seamless switchover.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
5 months ago
C: That makes sense, we need that seamless transition between paths for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
B: I agree, BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths for local convergence to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
6 months ago
A: I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
6 months ago
Ah, I see that BGP support for lossless switchover is the key here. That's a pretty important prerequisite for local convergence to work effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Dewitt
5 months ago
That's right, it's crucial for local convergence to work smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
6 months ago
Yes, BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
6 months ago
That's right, it's crucial for local convergence to work smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
6 months ago
Yes, BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
6 months ago
That's right, it ensures seamless failover in case of link failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
6 months ago
Yes, BGP must support lossless switchover between operational paths for local convergence to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77