Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 1 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 1
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer is implementing an RBAC on the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The role called Host A fails to clear LACP counters on the port channel 20. Which configuration resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lashanda
4 months ago
You know, this reminds me of the time I accidentally erased the entire network config on my router. Good times, good times. Anyway, Option B sounds like the way to go here. Gotta love those Cisco Nexus switches, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
4 months ago
Woah, wait a minute, we're just trying to clear some LACP counters, not rewrite the entire config! Option B all the way, my friends. Keep it simple, keep it clean.
upvoted 0 times
Annamae
3 months ago
Yeah, let's keep it simple and just delete and create a new rule. Option B it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
3 months ago
I agree, option B is the way to go. No need to complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denna
4 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'delete'? That's a big no-no in my book. Let's go with Option C and rearrange those rules instead. Better safe than sorry, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Changing the sequence of the rules might be a quicker fix, but it could also introduce other issues down the line. I'd go with Option B to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Nickolas
4 months ago
Yeah, let's go with Option B to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
4 months ago
I agree. Option B seems like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
4 months ago
I think changing the sequence of the rules might cause more problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
5 months ago
Option B seems to be the way to go here. Deleting the problematic rule and creating a new one is the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Gary
3 months ago
Let's go with option B then, it seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
3 months ago
I agree, it's a simple and effective way to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
3 months ago
Yeah, deleting the rule and creating a new one sounds like the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawana
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think changing the sequence of rule 2 and rule 3 could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Delete rule 2 and create a new rule 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Permit rule number 3 and read-write L3 operation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77