Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 10 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 10
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer is implementing an RBAC on the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The role called Host A fails to clear LACP counters on the port channel 20. Which configuration resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lucina
6 months ago
You know, I was also considering option B, but then I noticed that the question specifically mentions the 'read-write L3 operation'. So maybe option A, which includes that, could be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Deleting the existing rule 3 and creating a new one to allow the 'permit' command seems like the most straightforward solution. But let's hear what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
6 months ago
Good point. The 'read-write L3 operation' requirement is important. Option A might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Gayla
5 months ago
Yes, as long as the RBAC configuration is adjusted correctly, it should resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
5 months ago
I think the key is to ensure the proper permissions for LACP counters are set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
5 months ago
Changing the sequence of the rules might also fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
That could be a valid approach as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
But wouldn't deleting rule 3 and creating a new one to allow the permit command also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
5 months ago
I agree, allowing read-write L3 operation seems like the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
5 months ago
I think option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lamar
6 months ago
Hmm, that's an interesting idea. Rearranging the rules could potentially fix the problem. But let's not get too ahead of ourselves. We should probably double-check the options and make sure we're not missing something obvious.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77