Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 12 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 12
[All 300-615 Questions]

An engineer is implementing, Fibre Channel (FC) switching on a Cisco 9000 Series Switch, but the procedure fails with the message "FC traffic is not being routed through the fabric.". Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chi
5 months ago
I think Leslie might be onto something, configuring the VSAN ID on the specific link could also be a valid solution to the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
5 months ago
Wait, we're supposed to configure FSPF on Fibre Channel? I thought that was just for the regular internet. Guess I'll just flip a coin and go with D. Worst-case scenario, I'll blame it on the 'quantum entanglement' of the VSAN ID.
upvoted 0 times
Nikita
4 months ago
I'm going with option B, it just makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
4 months ago
I agree with User1, option A is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
4 months ago
Really? I thought option D was the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
4 months ago
You should go with option A, that will fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herminia
5 months ago
Seriously, they're testing us on Fibre Channel? I thought this was a networking exam, not a sci-fi convention. Anyway, I'll give B a shot. Gotta keep that FSPF link cost in check, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
5 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of Fibre Channel routing. I'm feeling lucky, so I'm gonna go with C. Adjusting the FSPF hello interval on the fc12 interface should do the trick. What could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Bettye
5 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I would go with A. Configuring the FSPF for VSAN 10 might be the key to fixing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
5 months ago
I think C is the way to go. Adjusting the FSPF hello interval on fc12 interface sounds like the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kallie
5 months ago
But setting the FSPF for VSAN 10 seems more logical to me, it should help route the FC traffic through the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
6 months ago
I'm going with D. Configuring the VSAN ID 10 on the link connected to fc1/12 seems like the logical choice here. Can't go wrong with that, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Configure the VSAN ID 10 on the link connected to fc1/12.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) Configure the FSPF for VSAN 10 on the NX9k-01-LAB switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
6 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. Setting the FSPF interface link cost to less than 30,000 in the IVR path should resolve the issue. Seemed pretty straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
Simona
5 months ago
That makes sense. Let's go with that solution then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. Setting the FSPF interface link cost to less than 30,000 in the IVR path should resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77