Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 3 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 3
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer needs to capture traffic from the VMs that utilize the IOM host interface Eth1/1/23 of a Cisco UCS B-Series chassis. A traffic analyzer is used to get traffic captured from the Eth1/4 interface of the subordinate fabric interconnect. The network engineer notices that traffic is not captured on the traffic analyzer. Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hui
4 months ago
Thanks for the clarification, option B makes sense now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
4 months ago
Option B is the correct answer because the traffic needs to be captured from Eth 1/4 of the subordinate fabric interconnect as mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
4 months ago
I am not sure, can someone explain why option B is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
4 months ago
I agree with Raul, option B seems to be the most relevant in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is correct because it specifically says to span the traffic from Eth 1/4 of the subordinate fabric interconnect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
4 months ago
I think the answer is option A because it mentions the Eth 1/2 of the subordinate fabric interconnect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
I agree with Emerson, I think the traffic should be spanned from the Eth 1/4 of the subordinate fabric interconnect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D, span the traffic from the Eth 1/4 of the primary fabric interconnect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
5 months ago
I think the answer is B, span the traffic from the Eth 1/4 of the subordinate fabric interconnect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
6 months ago
Hold on, guys. I'm not so sure about that. What if the issue is actually with the IOM host interface Eth1/1/23? Maybe we need to span the traffic from the Eth1/2 interface of the primary fabric interconnect instead, which is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
6 months ago
I agree with Lashon. Spanning the traffic from the primary fabric interconnect's Eth1/4 interface seems like the most logical solution. The subordinate fabric interconnect's Eth1/4 interface is not capturing the traffic, so we need to look at the primary one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
6 months ago
Haha, this is like a game of chess, trying to outmaneuver each other. I say we just go with option D and see if that works. If not, we can always try the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Nobuko
5 months ago
Alright, let's test out option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
5 months ago
Fingers crossed, option D might be the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
5 months ago
Okay, let's go with option D and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
5 months ago
Hmm, I think option D might be the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
I agree, let's try option D first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
5 months ago
Let's give option D a shot and see if it solves the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florencia
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The question states that the network engineer is trying to capture traffic from the VMs that use the IOM host interface Eth1/1/23 on the Cisco UCS B-Series chassis. But the traffic analyzer is not getting any traffic from the Eth1/4 interface of the subordinate fabric interconnect.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77