Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 5 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 5
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer is implementing an RBAC on the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The role called Host A fails to clear LACP counters on the port channel 20. Which configuration resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Yolando at Apr 12, 2024, 11:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-615 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Adria
6 months ago
I see your point, That could be a valid solution as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) Delete rule 3 and create new rule 3 to allow the permit command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
6 months ago
But wouldn't changing the sequence of rule 2 and rule 3 also resolve the issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
6 months ago
I believe the correct answer is D) Delete rule 2 and create a new rule 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
7 months ago
I think the answer is A) Permit rule number 3 and read-write L3 operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
7 months ago
I agree with Bev, deleting rule 2 and creating a new rule 4 would be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
7 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think deleting rule 3 and creating a new rule 3 to allow the permit command might work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe changing the sequence of rule 2 and rule 3 would resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
7 months ago
I think the correct configuration is to delete rule 2 and create a new rule 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
8 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer is trying to trick us here. They probably want us to carefully analyze the configuration and figure out the best solution, rather than just guessing randomly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
8 months ago
Haha, I'm glad I'm not the one taking this exam. Can you imagine being the network engineer who has to figure this out? Talk about a headache!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
8 months ago
Hmm, let me think about this. If the 'Host A' role is supposed to be able to clear the LACP counters, then maybe we need to adjust the permissions for that role. But without more details, it's hard to say for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
7 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
7 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
7 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francine
8 months ago
Good point. We should really read through the options carefully and try to understand the logic behind each one, rather than just picking the first one that seems plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option D. Deleting rule 2 and creating a new rule 4 seems like it might create more problems than it solves. We'd need to be really confident that's the right move.
upvoted 0 times
Clemencia
7 months ago
G: Agreed. Let's see if that solves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
8 months ago
F: Sounds like a plan. Let's give it a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
8 months ago
E: So, we'll start with option A and then switch to option C if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
8 months ago
D: Good point, let's keep that as a backup plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
8 months ago
C: But what if it doesn't work? Maybe we should consider option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
8 months ago
B: I agree, we should try that first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
8 months ago
A: I think option A might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mabel
8 months ago
Option C is also worth considering. Changing the sequence of rule 2 and rule 3 might resolve the issue, but it's a bit of a guess without more information about the existing configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
8 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky. The exhibit shows some configuration, but it's not clear what the current issue is with the 'Host A' role and the LACP counters on port channel 20.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Deleting rule 3 and creating a new one to allow the permit command seems like the most straightforward solution. But I'm open to hearing other thoughts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
8 months ago
Alright, let's break this down. The question says the role called 'Host A' is failing to clear the LACP counters on port channel 20. So, we need to find the configuration that resolves this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not too familiar with the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch and RBAC configuration, so I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77