Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-620 Topic 10 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 10
[All 300-620 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is configuring a production Multi-Site solution to provide connectivity from EPGs from a specific site to networks reachable through a remote site L3OUT. All required schema and template objects are already defined. Which additional configuration must be implemented in the Multi-Site Orchestrator to support the cross-site connectivity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

in order to provide connectivity from EPGs from a specific site to networks reachable through a remote site L3OUT, a new stretched external EPG must be added to the existing L3OUT.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Carlene
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, using a service graph just to enable cross-site connectivity? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Option B is the most straightforward and appropriate solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option B is the way to go. Implementing a policy-based redirect using a service graph (option D) seems like overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
8 months ago
You make a good point, Samantha. Encrypting the traffic between sites is an important consideration for a production setup. I'm leaning towards B as well.
upvoted 0 times
Mary
8 months ago
It's important to consider all options before making a decision on the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
8 months ago
Implementing a policy-based redirect using a service graph might provide the necessary configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
8 months ago
I think adding a new stretched external EPG to the existing L3OUT could help with cross-site connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
8 months ago
Configuring a routable TEP pool for SITE1 might also be necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
8 months ago
Yes, CloudSec for intersite traffic encryption is definitely a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
8 months ago
I agree, encrypting the traffic between sites is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77