Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-620 Topic 10 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 10
[All 300-620 Questions]

How is broadcast forwarded in Cisco ACI Multi-Pod after ARP flooding is enabled?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Teri at Mar 10, 2024, 12:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Azzie
3 months ago
Agreed, let's see if anyone else has a different perspective on how broadcast is handled in Cisco ACI Multi-Pod after ARP flooding is enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
3 months ago
Yeah, it's a tough question. Let's wait for more opinions before deciding on the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
4 months ago
I see your point, Alba. C) could also be a possibility for how broadcast is forwarded in Cisco ACI Multi-Pod.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but D) For the specific bridge domain, all spines forward the broadcast frames to IPN routers seems like a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) Broadcast frames are forwarded inside the pod and across the IPN using the multicast address that is associated to the bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Ingress replication is used on the spines to forward broadcast frames in the IPN infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
Hmm, that could actually be a good option too. It does make sense for broadcast frames to be forwarded using multicast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
I disagree. I think the answer is C) Broadcast frames are forwarded inside the pod and across the IPN using the multicast address that is associated to the bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
5 months ago
I agree with user Billi. Ingress replication makes sense for efficient broadcast forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Ingress replication is used on the spines to forward broadcast frames in the IPN infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
6 months ago
Option B sounds plausible too, with the ingress leaf switch flooding the broadcast frame on all fabric ports within a pod. I feel like we need to really understand the ACI Multi-Pod architecture to nail this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. It seems like the most comprehensive answer, talking about broadcast frames being forwarded inside the pod and across the IPN using multicast. But I'm not 100% sure, so I'm open to hearing other perspectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
6 months ago
I agree, German. This question is focused on a specific ACI feature, and we need to carefully understand the different options to determine the correct answer. It's not straightforward, but I think we can work through this together.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
6 months ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of how broadcast forwarding works in Cisco ACI Multi-Pod. I'm not sure about the exact answer, but I think it has something to do with either ingress replication or multicast forwarding across the IPN.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawnda
5 months ago
C) Broadcast frames are forwarded inside the pod and across the IPN using the multicast address that is associated to the bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
5 months ago
A) Ingress replication is used on the spines to forward broadcast frames in the IPN infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77